Coursework Information Sheet
Unit Name:
Leading and Managing People
|
Unit Code:
SHR012-6
|
Your Task:
Formulate a critical and constructive response to this manager in the
form of a carefully considered e-mail (no more than 1,400 words) on ONE of the following topics
(incorporating evidence-based argument to support your views and to advise what
it all means):
▪
flexibility and
the psychological contract;
▪
team-working;
▪
ethics and
social responsibility;
▪
managing
organisational change;
▪
managing a
diverse workforce.
Assignment Guidance
Section / Title
|
Details / Guidance
|
University Cover sheet
|
Include name, student ID number, unit title and code, assessment
title, date of submission.
|
Title page
|
Title of e-mail. Address
(to/from) and date the e-mail.
|
Introduction
(around 200 words)
|
Short introduction to the discussion initially clarifying why Leading
and Managing People is a relevant unit to study and also identifying the
topic you intend to discuss in making the business case for this
assignment.
|
Discussion of topic
(around 1000 words)
|
Provide a detailed and critical discussion of
the topic chosen. Ensure you define
the area clearly and include relevant academic literature, theories and
current thinking about the topic. Evaluate the merits and disadvantages of
this topic area to a business and specifically to the manager. How well does
it work and what causes it to go wrong? Citations from or references to
research and/or other sources of evidence is expected. It will also be useful to include examples
of this topic in action in current organizations to show how knowledge about
leadership and management has been systematically applied to improve
individual and corporate outcomes. You may also wish to challenge the
manager’s view that there are no ‘right’ answers in the people
leadership/management arena: even if the answers aren’t absolutely ‘right’,
are there some answers which are better than others?
|
Conclusion recommendations
(around 200 words)
|
Summaries the main findings from your discussion and make your final
suggestions to this manager.
|
Reference List
|
A list of the third-party sources you have
consulted and which are cited directly in the text. All these sources should be properly
identified. Harvard style (see the
Learning Resources website:lrweb.beds.ac.uk/help/guide-to-ref).
|
Appendices
|
No appendices are necessary
|
Word Limit
|
1,400 words +/- 10%
|
Submission
|
You should submit your report electronically via BREO Assignments
on-line. Please submit in PDF or word document format.
|
Assessment Criteria
|
As illustrated below
|
Good Academic Practice
|
Please see appendix A at the end of this brief for guidance on this
issue.
|
Marking Guidelines
Mark Band: 70-100% (Outstanding/Excellent)
Knowledge
Knowledge of the subject matter concerning the chosen topic area, both
the theoretical/academic literature and the illustrative cases is demonstrably
comprehensive. The reader can be confident that this student ‘knows his/her
stuff’, with a judicious mix of factual knowledge and critical evaluation.
Understanding
Comprehensive analysis of a range of related concepts and ideas.
Evidence based argument demonstrating an excellent understanding of theory
and/or organizational practice. Statements of ‘fact’ and personal belief
supported by citations from an extensive range of appropriate up to date third
party sources, research and relevant literature.
Persuasion
Concepts expressed with exceptional clarity in a convincing and cogent
manner. Sensitive to emotional, attitudinal and political aspects of corporate
life. Third-party sources are properly described, and the logic of the argument
throughout the discussion is strongly persuasive.
Presentation
The discussion presented is produced in strict conformity with the
guidelines contained in the assignment brief. The text is wide-ranging, the
style mature, the approach measured, the presentation reader-friendly.
Mark Band: 60-69% (Commendable)
Knowledge
The discussion exhibits quite a good understanding of the chosen topic
area from both the theoretical and applied perspectives. The submission is
liberally supplied with references to and citations from authoritative
third-party sources.
Understanding
Good analysis of related concepts and ideas. Appropriate evidence based
argument demonstrating good understanding of theory and/or organizational
practice. Statements of ‘fact’ and
personal belief reinforced by citations from an appropriate and broad range of
third-party sources, research and relevant literature.
Persuasion
The issues of the chosen topic and concepts are clearly and concisely
expressed and the subtleties concerning its operation in practice are discussed
in an appropriately logical, confident and persuasive manner.
Presentation
The overall presentation of the discussion is articulate, lucid,
structurally sensible and mature in expression. The references are organized
conscientiously and comprehensively.
Mark Band: 50-59% (Good Pass)
Knowledge
Some of the essential literature and research sources on the chosen
topic area have been consulted and are referenced throughout the discussion.
Occasionally the student relies upon some low-level citations; some third-party
material may even be quoted without question. The discussion appears quite
strong on description and narrative but needs more evaluation and critique.
Understanding
Satisfactory analysis of some appropriate concepts. Some evidence based
argument demonstrated which draws on theory and/or organizational practice.
Statements of ‘fact’ and personal belief reinforced by citations from an
appropriate, but limited, range of third-party sources, research and relevant
literature.
Persuasion
Concepts expressed in a clear and systematic manner however there is
scope to make the discussion even more persuasive.
Presentation
Though the discussion presented is generally systematic, there are
improvements that the student should have implemented, for example, over-long
and discursive paragraphs or too short and fragmented paragraphs which render
some pages un-reader-friendly.
Mark Band: 40-49% (Satisfactory Pass)
Knowledge
Limited range of literature and research sources on the chosen topic
area has been consulted and is referenced throughout the discussion. There is
over-reliance on low-level citations and third-party material may even be
quoted without question. The discussion appears reasonable enough on
description and narrative but needs a more developed approach to establish a
good evaluative argument.
Understanding
Limited analysis. Lacks enough evidence based argument. Limited
reference to theory and/or organisational practice or used inappropriately.
Statements of ‘fact’ and personal belief insufficiently reinforced by citations
from appropriate third-party sources, research and relevant literature.
Persuasion
Limited expression of concepts clearly, systematically and/or
confidently. There is scope to make the discussions more logical and coherent
to persuade much more.
Presentation
Though the discussion presented is reasonably systematic, there are
improvements that the student should have implemented, for example, over-long
and discursive sections/paragraphs or too short and fragmented
sections/paragraphs which render some pages un-reader-friendly. There is scope
for the work to be better organised.
Mark Bands: 35-39% (Marginal Fail); 1-34% (Fail)
Knowledge
There is little evidence that the student has undertaken any serious
study about the chosen topic area. Instead, the discussion presented relies
upon a very limited number of largely low-level, descriptive and narrative
sources which are presented uncritically. There may be elementary errors and
omissions.
Understanding
Inadequate or no analysis. Lacks evidence based argument. Insufficient
reference to theory and/or organisational practice or used inappropriately.
Statements of ‘fact’ and personal belief not reinforced by citations from any
appropriate third-party sources, research and relevant literature.
Persuasion
Fails to express concepts clearly, systematically and/or confidently.
The work is insufficiently persuasive and does not reflect robust understanding
of how the chosen topic works in practice and makes a contribution to
organisational life.
Presentation
The structure of the discussion presented is unacceptable, as it
deviates from the model presented in the assignment brief yet does so without
any attempt to persuade the reader that such deviations might be legitimate.
Section headings are not used, or do not reflect the contents beneath; the
references are confused or omitted. There is scope for the work to be better organized.
Appendix A - Guidance on academic practice
1. Good academic practice
Good academic practice is the use of ideas, research findings and text
by a learner in ways that recognize where these represent the knowledge of
others. It is important because it enables learners:
▪ To demonstrate
their breadth of reading by identifying and comparing their sources of
information;
▪ To demonstrate
an individual understanding of their findings as they learn, by using their
words to describe and interpret the ideas of others;
▪ To develop
their own originality by synthesizing, commenting on and structuring their
argument around the contributions of others;
▪ To apply their
reading and their understanding to a range of subjects and situations in ways
that make clear their process and their conclusions.
To do this, learners are required to:
Recognize the origins of ideas and of statements, where these are not
theirs, to recognize the difference between the two, and to deal with each
appropriately within their own work.
▪ Report
accurately the findings of their research (primary and secondary)
▪ Submit work for
assessment that represents their individual and independent effort unless
otherwise advised in the assessment brief.
▪ Doing this is
good academic practice.
Referencing systems are used to identify where a writer is using the
ideas and words of others. They ensure that both writer and reader are able to
distinguish accurately between a learner's own ideas, their interpretation of
the ideas and words of others, and their direct use of the ideas and words of
others in their own work.
2. Academic practice and learning
The University encourages its learners to demonstrate their reading and
their research by making appropriate reference in their work to the ideas and
words of others.
▪ It requires
learners to use a referencing system (see http://lrweb.beds.ac.uk/guides/referencing),
and it expects learners to use this system fully and accurately as a way of
making clear to readers where the ideas and words of others have been used.
▪ It recognizes
that learners need to develop their use of referencing systems as part of their
learning process, within the subject area(s) they are studying.
▪ It also recognizes that the importance of acknowledging the ideas and words of others
as a requirement of good academic practice is new to some of its learners.
In this context, the University outlines the responsibilities of
learners as follows.
B. The responsibilities of learners
▪ To identify
accurately where they have used in their work the words and/or ideas of others.
▪ To use
referencing systems accurately in that identification.
▪ To avoid
practices that may give rise to academic concern and/or suspicion of academic offense.
▪ To read this
policy, and to attend and make use of the guidance and support offered at
induction (or the additional/replacement guidance and support sessions offered
for late arriving students).
▪ To make use of
the further guidance and support offered at each study stage in advance of the
first deadline for submitted work.
▪ To seek
assistance if they are, for any reason, unable to take advantage of the
standard guidance and support offered.
▪ To complete and
sign the assignment cover sheet for each piece of work submitted, confirming
that they understand this policy and its requirements
▪ To take full
responsibility for work that is submitted in their name
▪ To bring to the
attention of an invigilator any circumstance or event that might be evidence
of, or suggest, a breach of academic discipline.
To get solution visit our website www.arabessay.com
Get acess to motivational quotes for men, motivational quotes for men, quotes for her, women etc. All types of quotes are here. good night quotes
ReplyDelete